FLUX.2 Pro vs Midjourney
最近更新：2026年11月
Black Forest Labs' 2026 flagship image model. Open weights, self-hostable, with photorealism that trades blows with GPT Image 1.5 on the LM Arena leaderboard. Compare it with Midjourney: Midjourney's flagship image model (V8.2, the default since July 2026) with the deepest stylised aesthetics, mature parameter system, and a creator community that pushes the edge of look development.
快速概览
| FLUX.2 Pro | Midjourney | |
|---|---|---|
| 价格 | $7.5/month | $10/month |
| 类型 | 开源 | 闭源 |
| 免费版本 | 支持 | 不支持 |
详细对比
自己跑一遍这组对比
同一条 prompt、同一画幅，只换模型。逐个跑一遍，在你自己的屏幕上判断差别。
测试 prompt · 画幅 1:1
Studio product photo of an unbranded matte ceramic coffee mug in sage green, steam rising, on a light oak table beside a folded linen napkin and three coffee beans. Soft window light from the left, gentle shadow, e-commerce hero shot.
FLUX.2 Pro 不在 Imgo 上——复制 prompt 去那边测试。
Midjourney 不在 Imgo 上——复制 prompt 去那边测试。
- 改用 Nano Banana 2 运行
如何选择?
以下场景推荐 FLUX.2 Pro
- •Studios that need on-prem or air-gapped image generation
- •Pipelines optimized for cost-per-image at scale
- •Teams already invested in the FLUX / ComfyUI ecosystem
以下场景推荐 Midjourney
- •Concept artists, illustrators, and look-dev teams
- •Brand and editorial teams chasing a strong distinctive style
- •Creators producing fashion, fantasy, or editorial visuals